Luke 22:14-20; Holy Thursday; April 17, 2025;

Life in Christ Lutheran Church, Grand Marais, MN;

And when the hour came, [Jesus] reclined at table, and the apostles with him. And he said to them, “I have earnestly desired to eat this Passover with you before I suffer. For I tell you I will not eat it until it is fulfilled in the kingdom of God.” And he took a cup, and when he had given thanks he said, “Take this, and divide it among yourselves. For I tell you that from now on I will not drink of the fruit of the vine until the kingdom of God comes.” And he took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and gave it to them, saying, “This is my body, which is given for you. Do this in remembrance of me.” And likewise the cup after they had eaten, saying, “This cup that is poured out for you is the new covenant in my blood.” (Luke 22:14–20, ESV)

Grace and peace to you from our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Amen.

On this holy night, we remember that Jesus gave us his supper. Tomorrow, he hangs on the cross to forgive our sins. On Sunday he rises from the dead, to give us the promise of resurrection. Tonight, he makes his last will and testament. This text says, covenant, but it is the same thing. Jesus, himself, gives us this supper as his testament and promise of our sins forgiven and our resurrection.

We would do well to look at exactly what he does, what he says and what he asks us to do when we celebrate this supper. This being a will, the words are very specifically chosen. No one says anything in a will that is useless, or unmeaning.

Firstly, the context, all this takes place during the celebration of Passover. That’s when the Jews gather to remember God’s salvation from Egypt. God sent plagues to convince Pharoah to set them free. Pharoah refused until the final stroke. God sent the angel of death and killed all the first born in Egypt. He made one provision. Every house that had the blood of a lamb spread on the door post would be spared. So, as the people of God sat in their houses with blood on the door, God’s angel brought death everywhere else. For them it was an act of faith. Those who believed God’s promise lived. Afterwards, Pharoh couldn’t wait to get rid of them. His own son was dead. He would later change his mind, but that’s another story.

This event, Passover, is the major saving event of the Old Testament. God’s name YHWH is a reminder of that. It’s the name he gave them to use at that time. He gave it to Moses when the whole process of ending their slavery began. Every time that name is used, every time rescue is mentioned, every time the promised land is mentioned, in the Old Testament, every Hebrew would make the connection to the Passover.

It is in this context that Jesus makes his new covenant. Simply stated, Jesus’ blood saves us from slavery to sin and death. Just like the sacrificed lamb’s blood. Of course, I’m preaching to the choir when I say it is much more than a symbol of what he is doing. When we look at the actual words he uses, one in particular, chosen with great care, we see that. The word is is. In Greek

τοῦτό ἐστιν τὸ σῶμά μου (literally: this is the body of me)

You could say this phrase in many ways and Greek doesn’t require the linking verb, is. But remembering that Jesus is choosing his words very carefully, is is very important. It’s not “depends on how you define, is” ala Bill Clinton. From the context, the importance of what Jesus is doing, Passover and the blood of and actual lamb spread on the door posts, is means is.

There may have been more ink spilled on this single word, theologically speaking, than any other word. William of Ockham was a late 13th-century philosopher and theologian who despised overcomplicating things. His theorem, called Occam’s Razor, points this out.

Entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity. — William of Ockham (c. 1287–1347)

In plain English it means:

When you’re faced with competing hypotheses that make the same predictions, the one with the fewest assumptions is preferable.

Or even simpler: The simplest explanation that accounts for all the facts is usually the best one.

So, how does this apply here? Well, in Greek the word ἐστιν means is. It is never used to mean symbolically. In fact, Greek has another word for that Σημαίνω. It means signifies. Should Jesus have just used this word to avoid confusion? I think it’s fair to say the creator of the universe knows what he said. I would rather stand before the throne of God, having to explain why I took Jesus at his word than the other way around. In other words, given all the facts, the context, and the words, the simplest meaning is that is means is. What Jesus meant to say is that the bread and wine are his body and blood. How that is true is a mystery.

There is one more phrase that is critical in understanding the supper. The words in Greek again are: τὸ ὑπὲρ ὑμῶν διδόμενον. Or “the thing given on behalf of you” or as we say in the Words of institution “given for you”. And the phrase is a present passive participle. That’s fancy grammar for “starting right now” it’s not just a future event on the cross but already beginning in the Supper when Jesus gave. So, the gifts, forgiveness, life and salvation are for you in this meal beginning now. The disciples at the table received Jesus body and blood and the forgiveness of their sins.

Martin Luther said about these words,

“The words ‘for you’ require all hearts to believe. This treasure is not begged for nor earned by our works. It is offered without cost and is to be received with thanksgiving.” — Luther, LC V.62–64

So, the for you is exclusive. It is for those who believe. In other words, it is for some, but not all. Every church has exclusions from the supper. Most would deny it to Buddhists, Mormons, Jehovah’s Witnesses, or even the Klu, Klux Klan. If you ask them why they will say they lack faith in Jesus (even though the KKK claims to be Christian). The question is, where do you draw the line as to who is excluded and who is included? It is in the for you. Quite simply, Jesus first gave it to believers and said it was for them, for believers. The Supper of Jesus is for the Church, that is, for the community of believers.

The Lord’s Supper is not neutral. Through faith it gives grace. Without faith it gives judgement.

Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty concerning the body and blood of the Lord. Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup. For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment on himself. 1 Corinthians 11:27–29 (ESV)

In some ways, I think we don’t take these words seriously. But it is serious, in fact, deadly serious. Paul adds,

That is why many of you are weak and ill, and some have died. 1 Corinthians 11:30 (ESV)

So, in this Congregation of Corinthians, there were those who were sick and died, because they weren’t discerning the body. Paul is being literal. Is he only speaking about unbelief? No, obviously, it is a congregation of believers. This was an admonition, not of faith, but wrong faith. The body isn’t only the presence of Jesus, his body, in the supper but the body of faith.

How do I know this? Paul, himself, in the next chapter of the letter, calls the church, the Body of Christ.

You are the body of Christ and individually members of it. (1 Cor. 12:27)

And in 11:20-22 he condemns the Corinthians for division and selfishness in the Supper. In this larger context Paul says to discern the body is to: Recognize your brothers and sisters in Christ, act with love, humility and unity in the gathered body. And to avoid factionalism and pride. So, the church is responsible for avoiding obvious division in the Church, especially when considering the Supper of the Lord.

I think it is fair to say that Church of Christ is divided, much more now than when Jesus gave this gift to her. On any topic from the Real Presence of Jesus body and blood in the supper to what will happen at the end of time. What it means to be saved by faith and how works are active in the life of a believer. Not to mention the gross distortions of unrepentant homosexual behavior and support for the killing of the unborn. These are serious divisions in the body of Christ. Should they not be considered when it comes to the Lord’s most holy gift to the church? Paul says so. This is the simplest understanding of what he says.

Earlier in the Letter, Paul also says this,

This is how one should regard us: as servants of Christ and stewards of the mysteries of God. Moreover, it is required of stewards that they be found faithful. 1 Corinthians 4:1–2, ESV

He is of course talking about pastors here, as stewards. Stewards of the mysteries of God. The Lord’s Supper is one of the greatest mysteries of the faith. The word steward (οἰκονόμος) here means one who is obligated to follow the instructions of the master. I take these words (in fact all of scripture) seriously. I don’t own the supper; I am responsible for its distribution. It is improper (that is not being a faithful steward) to give sacred food to those who are hostile to the faith. Anyone who doesn’t believe what it is, Jesus body and blood for the forgiveness of sins, those who are unrepentant, that is, those who don’t seen the need for repentance, and are not united in faith. This responsibility can be and often is a great burden. But thankfully there is forgiveness for err. And I have often done so.

The question is, what is unity? The divisions in the church are clearly defined. Baptist churches don’t believe in the real presence, ELCA Lutherans believe in supporting homosexuality. Roman Catholics believe they participate in their salvation. I realize that not all members of these churches believe in everything they teach. But it is the responsibility of Christians to seek out churches that teach the word faithfully. It is my responsibility to faithfully administer the Sacrament according to God’s Word. And the word warns against spiritual harm for those who do not discern the Body of Christ. The supper isn’t for everyone. A pastor is responsible for this work, in his own congregation, not as a doorman, but as a steward.

So, what about the gift? We return to Jesus’ words, for you. That is what Paul means when he says, examine yourselves, he is talking about you confidently grasping the gifts offered in the supper for you. He is talking about you firmly holding on to the promise of salvation for you, in the forgiveness of your sin. He is talking about your confession of faith, in all that Jesus has said. The attitude should be one like the desperate father in Mark. His son was demon possessed. He asks for healing for his son. Jesus says to him, “All things are possible for one who believes.” His response: “I believe; help my unbelief.”

In this context, the supper is here for you. Doubt isn’t the issue. We all have doubt. In fact, doubt is reversed through the gift of faith and assurance of forgiveness that is offered in this sacred meal. If you believe in the for you of the supper, it is indeed here for you.

Again, Luther says,

If a person does not desire the Sacrament, I let him go. [I do not preach much to him about the benefits, for he is a coarse pig; he does not desire it.] But if he comes on his own and says, ‘I want to be a Christian and receive the Sacrament,’ I cannot refuse him, if only he gives evidence of his faith and receives instruction, lest we give it to swine and dogs. Luther’s Works, AE 51:98

He doesn’t mean he lets him go to the supper, he means he lets him go without it. Then he says what is necessary to receive it. gives evidence of his faith and receives instruction.

You may not like the practice of closed communion. Sometimes, I hate it. But we must for the sake of what Jesus and Paul say, continue to do it. Amen.

The peace of God that passes all understanding keep your hearts and minds in Christ Jesus. Amen.